COPYCENSE

After a brief pause for the cause, we’re back. Perhaps not “back and better than ever,” but back — with an addition to the staff. Clippings 1.02 marks the editorial debut of Kim Hagedorn.

Kim will be helping us compile Clippings editions and other Copycense content through early May. She is completing a master’s degree in library and information science at Syracuse University’s School of Information Studies, and she will be attending law school in the fall. (We’re hoping we had little to do with that decision.) As you shall soon see, Kim immediately fits right in with the wide-ranging, occasionally irreverent tone we have set for Copycense Clippings.

In this edition, a federal judge tells Big Music to pay tribute to an aggrieved mom; senators continue their mission to force your ISP to snoop on you; Apple’s chairman rankles noses at the suggestion of DRM-free music; and now the DMCA is being invoked to halt the Electric Slide.

Quote of the Week

“Unlike the courts in the unpublished opinions cited by the plaintiffs, this Court must consider whether a defendant should receive an award of attorneys’ fees when she successfully defends against the novel application of secondary copyright infringement claims… Her only alternative to litigating the plaintiffs’ contributory or vicarious liability claim was to capitulate to a settlement for violation she insists she did not commit. Such capitulation would not advance the aims of the Copyright Act as the plaintiffs’ untested theory would remain untested.” — Judge Lee R. West, presiding judge, Capitol Records, Inc. et al. v. Debbie Foster (04-1569-W, U.S. Dist. Ct., W.D. Oklahoma) Ars Technica. Victim of RIAA “Driftnet” Awarded Attorneys’ Fees. Feb. 7, 2007. A federal court judge actually said this? Did we read that correctly? Not only did a federal judge dismiss an RIAA “file sharing” case, he actually awarded attorney’s fees to the aggrieved defendant. So, why has it taken this long for the rest of the judiciary to recognize that the federal court system should not be leveraged as an industry’s protectionist response to a failing business model? Categories: Music; Cases & Litigation; File Sharing, P2P & Downloads.

Site Check

Recording Industry vs. The People. This publication is devoted to “the RIAA’s lawsuits of intimidation brought against ordinary working people,” and contains an index to many source documents that have been filed in several key RIAA-sponsored lawsuits against citizens engaged in so-called “piracy.” At first glance, this site (edited by New York entertainment lawyers Ty Rogers and Ray Beckerman) appears to be a welcome and comprehensive resource. Categories: Music; Cases & Litigation; File Sharing, P2P & Downloads.

Clippings

• Declan McCullagh. GOP Revises ISP-Tracking Legislation. News.com. Feb. 7, 2007. The always-a-step-ahead McCullagh reports on federal legislation that will require all ISP providers to retain information about their subscribers so compliance with court orders will be easier was introduced. Requirement details will be up to Attorney General Gonzales. Due to the broad language used in the bill, he will be able to dictate that ISP providers keep logs of consumer browsing, IM messages, e-mails, etc. Categories: Laws & Regulations; Privacy.
• Ars Technica. Apple Would “Switch to Selling Only DRM-free Music” If Labels Agree. Feb. 6, 2007. After suffering the slings and arrows of Big Music’s outrageous greed since iTunes virtually created the market for legal, purchased digital music — and feeling European pressure over FairPlay — Apple chairman Steve Jobs lays down the gauntlet and challenges the record labels to open up their music files. In a game of chess, that would be called “Check.” Categories: DRM & Copy Protection; Music.
• bIPlog. Day of the RFIDs. Feb. 6, 2007. California’s Identity Information Protection Act of 2007 (SB 30) is up for review by the committee of the Judiciary again. If passed, the act will protect citizens’ privacy from secret scanning which can be done if a person has an object that has an RFID embedded in it. Categories: Laws & Regulations; Privacy.
• Michael Barbaro. Wal-Mart and Studios in Film Deal. The New York Times. Feb. 6, 2006. So the ol’ Midwesterners beat Slick Steve Jobs to the punch on getting the movie studios to do downloads. We wonder if the studios’ decision is about Wal-Mart providing the better deal, or just a strong aversion to Jobs. Categories: Web & Online; Film.
• Josephine Wolff. University Library Joins Google Book Search. Daily Princetonian. Feb. 6, 2007. Princeton University has joined other powerhouse libraries such as Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford in the Google Books Library Project. They will be digitizing 1 million of their books to be accessible through Google Books Library. Princeton feels that by digitizing books that are no longer protected under copyright and providing access via Google, it will provide researchers a new wealth of materials previously easily accessible. Categories: Digitization; Education; Libraries & Information Science; Open Access.
• Vocoid. Vocoid & the Medly Remix Contest. Feb. 6, 2007. Vocoid will be hosting a contest allowing contestants to mix raw audio from their album Medly using ccMixter. Categories: Music; Remixes & Derivative Works; Events.
• bIPlog. Recent Decision About GPS, Privacy, and the Fourth Amendment. Feb. 5, 2007. Esteemed Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner recently ruled that the police did not violate a citizens’ privacy and Fourth Amendment rights when they placed a GPS device on this car and collected data to use against him. In fact, Posner said that there does not need to be probable cause for the authorities to legally place a GPS device on a suspect’s vehicle. Hmmm. Categories: Cases & Litigation; Privacy & Security; Law & Regulation; Tech & Devices.
• Jordan Robertson. Apple, Beatle Settle Trademark Lawsuit. BusinessWeek.com (via Associated Press) Feb. 5, 2007. After another once-per-decade battle, the Beatles’ Apple and Jobs’ Apple make nice. America’s Apple — note the removal of “Computer” from the official company name — gets to keep the logo and name while Apple Corps Ltd. gets to license rights from the iPod company. Apple Inc. is not out of the clear, however, since its next big suit is with Cisco Systems Inc. regarding “iPhone.” Categories: Music; Tech & Devices; Trademark.
• 43(B)log. Kings of Crunk Reign in Summary Judgment. Feb. 5, 2007. After plaintiff Wilchcombe sued defendants for copyright infringement, alleging that they unlawfully used the musical work and sound recording of the song “Tha Weedman” on Lil Jon’s Kings of Crunk album, a federal court dismissed the lawsuit. The court stated that since Wilchcombe recorded the interlude song knowing the song was going to put on the album, Teevee Toons, Inc. did not violate copyright law. Presumably, dutchies shall make the rounds in celebration. Categories: Cases & Litigation; Infringement; Music.
• David Lazarus. TiVo Sees If You Skip Those Ads. SFGate.com. Feb. 4, 2007. TiVo announced that it will be offering ad companies the opportunity to purchase data regarding which commercials their customers skip. However, TiVo says that the data that is available has been stripped of all personal information so as to maintain consumer privacy. They will soon start a program similar to the Nielson Ratings – a group of subscribers will volunteer to have their TiVo usage recorded without stripping the data of their personal information. Categories: Privacy & Security; Broadcasting & Journalism; Tech & Devices.
• Daniel Terdiman. Electric Slide on Slippery DMCA Slope. News.com. Feb. 3, 2007. Now, this is silly enough to be interesting. A man claiming to have invented and copyrighted the Electric Slide is having Web sites shut down by invoking the DMCA’s automatic takedown provisions. An attorney from the Electronic Frontier Foundation says dances can be copyrighted. What the EFF attorney doesn’t say is whether the copyright applies to the movement, or the fixation of the movement in either some form of visual medium or in notation. We wonder if Bill Patry has addressed this question in his brand spanking new treatise. Categories: DMCA.
• Reuters. Piracy Worked For Use, Romania President Tells Gates. WashingtonPost.com. Feb. 1, 2007. The Microsoft chairman was probably saying to himself, “Dude, I already gave at the office.” Categories: Computers & Technology; Infringement; International.
• Brian Krebs. Accountability Is Key Goal of Privacy Legislation. WashingtonPost.com. Feb. 1, 2007. A new bill is being created by panel chairman Rep. Barney Frank that will allow companies who protect their data with encryption to waive notifying customers if their databases are breached. The Cyber Security Industry Alliance supports Frank’s bill and feels that companies who make attempts to protect their data should be protected by something similar to the safe harbor limitation on liability. The bill also proposes that retailers should have more accountability with regards to data breaches. Opponents to the bill feel that it is punishing smaller companies who do not have the funds to create as stringent security as the large companies. Categories: Databases; Law & Regulation; Privacy & Security.
• Kim Willsher. Heir of Victor Hugo Fails To Stop Les Mis II. Guardian Unlimited. Jan. 31, 2007. It seems that Victor Hugo’s, author of Les Miserables, great-great-grandson lost his appeal yesterday opposing a sequel of the book. Hugo felt the book violated the “moral rights” of family. The French court disagreed. Categories: Books; Cases & Litigation; International.
• IPTAblog. Citing to Wikipedia in School and in Court. Jan. 30, 2007. The history department at Middlebury College has decided to join forces and create a department wide policy that bans students from using Wikipedia in their papers. The department found that students were using Wikipedia as their only source and were therefore citing incorrect information in their papers. They feel that college level students should be taught how to locate quality information. Wikipedia agrees with Middlebury College in that students should not being using their information as their primary source but rather as a starting point. So, federal judges can use the free encyclopedia, but college students cannot. Categories: Cases & Litigation; Education; Open Access.
• The Patry Copyright Blog. Books on Tape and First Sale. Jan. 30, 2007. The always razor sharp William Patry breaks down a case that addresses the question of whether books on tapes are covered by the exception to the first sale’s rental right. Categories: Books; Cases & Litigation; First Sale.
• Thomas Claburn. Appeals Court Shoots Down Copyright Challenge. InformationWeek. Jan. 23, 2007. The Ninth Circuit rejects a second legal challenge to the Copyright Term Extension Act. Categories: Public Domain & Term; Law, Legislation & Regulation; Cases & Litigation.
• InfoWorld. Will EULAs Follow UCITA into Oblivion? Jan. 18, 2007. The razor sharp Ed Foster addresses the issue of software licenses, which are receiving increased scrutiny in the wake of the release of Microsoft’s Vista operating system. One of the good things about Foster’s commentary is that he often speaks to and quotes regular computer-using folks and gets their take on the issue of end-user licensing agreements. We’ve always considered these licenses to be adhesion contracts, but what do we know? (See also Jennifer Granick’s 2007 prediction column, in which she bets that state legislators will begin to take a second look at the one-sided agreements.) Categories: Licensing & Permissions; Computers & Technology.
• Eliot Van Buskirk. Who’s Killing MP3 and ITunes? Wired News. Jan. 8, 2007. This Wired story foreshadowed Steve Job’s broadside against Big Music. (See above.) Categories: Music; File Sharing, P2P & Downloads; Web & Online.

CopyCense™: Creativity & Code.™ A venture of Seso Group LLC.

Technorati Tags: CopyCense, CopyCense Clippings, copyright, DRM, K. Matthew Dames, licensing